Not known Facts About tort and contract law cases
Not known Facts About tort and contract law cases
Blog Article
seventy seven . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 on the Constitution based over the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement inside the FIR lodged by FIA and while in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
Its enforcement with the provision of capital punishment or life imprisonment underscores the value of human life as well as importance of maintaining regulation and order in society.
These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and involve all notable cases decided via the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.
Some bodies are provided statutory powers to issue guidance with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, including the Highway Code.
lengthy period petitioner was not regarded as for promotion, meeting with the departmental promotion committee and take into account the petitioner (Promotion)
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming on the main case, it is also a very well-proven proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry more info has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is subject matter to your procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings on the evidence.
In this case, the Supreme Court of Pakistan upheld the death penalty to the accused who intentionally murdered the sufferer.
The issue Here's that an accused may well say that they meant to injure the victim, but they didn't plan to eliminate them. In other words, they might claim that thedeath that resulted as a result of accused’s attack was neither foreseeable nor meant.
Civil Courts retain jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it calls for legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be generated and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
All bankruptcy courts have a telephone information system, also known as the Voice Case Information System, that permits callers to obtain essential case information through a touchtone phone. This is free to use and available 24 hours a day.
Preserving Social Order: By imposing strict penalties for murder, Section 302 PPC reinforces the principle of social order and steadiness. It demonstrates the commitment on the state to protect its citizens and copyright the rule of regulation.
Article 199 of the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other adequate remedy is provided by regulation." It truly is effectively-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust obtainable remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether All those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
P.C. for grant of post arrest bail should even be dismissed. Suffice is to observe that that considerations for pre- arrest and post-arrest bail are completely different. Reliance in this regard is placed on case legislation titled as “Shah Nawaz v. The State” 2005 SCMR 1899” wherein it has been held with the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:--